We are aware of the need to take appropriate action to make way for an educational reform that presents the educational crisis facing the country at all levels, of the need to pass to a new vision, requirements knowledge to make weight requirements Venezuela currently demand for professionals who can ensure the challenges and create the changes needed to promote development also need to consider towards this, giving way to a new educational curriculum supported by the consensus of all stakeholders, setting out in an open referendum, low educational consensus all suggestions that give strength to the curriculum, and not through the imposition of the criterion only the national government, supporting its own ideological and military characteristics.
The president and his team should have consulted the representatives before the public and private educational institutions what he thought of the reach, impact generated propuesto.Ello educational curriculum provided an opportunity to listen to weaknesses, threats, opportunities, strengths Curriculum that encloses and correct the weaknesses that affect the achievement of its objective, moreover, that unify criteria and commitments to the Venezuelan education.
Curriculum is the set of guidelines for an educational system. Defines how and what to teach and assess at each level of schooling. The Ministry of Education (MOE) is proposing a new model that encompasses all education, from kindergarten to fifth year of high school. Begin to be implemented this year in schools and colleges Bolivarian next school term and in the rest of the schools-public and private right, that this fact has led to mixed reactions, where the vast majority does not According to the content, scope of the curriculum, many consider ideologically alienating against freedom of thoughts to which he has been accustomed Venezuelan education in history, others simply believe that Chavez favors ideology of socialism he has invented and which is not typical of the era, there are those who maintain that its content leaves a lot to be said when the scope, implications for education.
The Government points out, that is his right to ensure education and keep in mind, that
State reserves the planning, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and correction, as functions of the educational process. The State has the power to grant concessions, through agreements, to some sectors of society can exercise the teacher made. But that does not mean that private institutions, for example, will develop the curriculum for the different levels of education to their own devices, nor mean that these institutions should not be accountable to the State, or that the state would no longer exercise supervision of these institutions, because that is one of its main functions within what is all the pedagogical process
Added in place, it is time to delve into the transformation of the curriculum, but not to impose specific lines of thought, or exclusive, as some say, but for the benefit of the entire population, because in general, the transformation of curriculum has to do with the construction of socialism in the XXI century. That we must not be any fear, because we are transforming a system based on education for selfishness, individualism and, ultimately, to savage capitalism. That was the old education system. That was the capitalist ideology. We are building the socialist ideology: education from the values of a true partnership, which is the teaching to live and work in terms of the collective and the unit. Ultimately it is the struggle of ideas.
protests have not been long in coming and in Valencia, Carabobo, for example, a group of teachers said that the education sector in the region declared an emergency to the disagreement about the proposed the implementation of the new Bolivarian Curriculum Design, which according to them, is to distort the history of Venezuela.
A partnership that brings together a group of parents and student representatives of Carabobo entity called on people who have a family study, seriously analyze the proposed curriculum vitae, because on it depends the future of paísHay who note that the workshops are "a waste of time and lack of respect for education professionals" because, as he said, "the group facilitators responsible for delivering the new curriculum does not have the tools or the training to do it. "
teachers union leader aragüeño considered the socialist educational proposal that seeks to introduce through the curriculum, was rejected by the majority of the Venezuelan population on December 2, 2007, to not approve the draft constitutional reform, which is considered illegal to the new curriculum, whose foundations remain against the current Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, and, of the Education Law and Regulations of the Teaching Profession Nevertheless, the holder of the office of People's Power Ministry for Education (MPPE) Adan Chavez, brother of President Chavez said that progress in the preparation of teachers for curriculum implementation Bolivarian Educational System (CSEB)., said that by the end of next July 300 000 teachers will be trained to develop new content in the 2008-09 school year.
since its announcement in September 2007, the academia, unions, teachers and private education have rejected execution. The reasons: it violates the Constitution at 102 "and plural democratic education? Respect to all currents of thought", and the Education Act, to create a new educational system and knowledge areas that are not covered and therefore is illegal.
Contents, especially in social sciences, are those who bear the greatest challenge, "there is concentrated the ideological and propaganda for Chavez thought, and a camouflaged military hue Bolivarianism" concerns a teacher who received the course on campus Pedro Fonte, in Montalban. Add another collateral damage will be the "poor" student training in sciences: Mathematics, Biology, Physics and Chemistry. "You see these materials as appendices where not deepen the content. Want to mask is the lack of teachers to group them by area."
No embargoes some say it will be a more active education "with the participation of students in their learning process. addition what's wrong with the students know more than Ezequiel Zamora, Francisco de Miranda or community councils? They say you want ideologize, but that is false. Neither teachers nor students are robots. "
It says, that ... "The programs are betting roughly highlight the imprint of the current administration: learn the history and highlight government projects endogenous development zamoranos farms, educational missions, projects and social programs and exaltation of the National Armed Forces and military world. During the fourth year of the Bolivarian High School, some of the content to be studied are: The political project and Isaias Medina Angarita government. The 1945 coup and U.S. intervention, but not the dictatorship of general study Marcos Pérez Jiménez and the January 23, 1958, for example. history of "representative democracy" begins in 1959.
definitely national controversy continues implementing the new Bolivarian curriculum. While some representatives of the teachers reject it on the grounds that is ideologizing, the government says the project has been well received by teachers, representing a social proposal, but not socialist.
Bolivarian The new curriculum is based on the ideas of Simón Rodríguez, Simón Bolívar, and Ezequiel Zamora, among others. will relate to the new forms of social organization, for example, elementary students will study the communal councils in his theory, and made of diversified activities with these organizations. participate in cooperative work also.
0 komentar:
Post a Comment